Ex parte PRIMEAU - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-0828                                                          
          Application 08/445,540                                                      


          position.                                                                   
               The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of              
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Finken et al. (Finken)        2,903,700           Sept. 15, 1959            
          Bowen                         3,262,125           Jul.  26, 1966            
          Hale                               3,732,574           May   15,            
          1973                                                                        
          Zide                               4,651,356           Mar.  24,            
          1987                                                                        
          Copeland et al. (Copeland)    5,093,936           Mar.  10, 1992            



               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as follows:                                                                 
               a) claims 1 and 8 as being unpatentable over Hale in view              
          of Bowen and Finken;                                                        
               b) claims 4, 5, 10 and 11 as being unpatentable over Hale              
          in view of Bowen and Finken, and further in view of Copeland;               
          and                                                                         
               c) claims 6 and 12 as being unpatentable over Hale in                  
          view of Bowen and Finken, and further in view of Zide.                      
               Reference is made to the appellant’s brief (Paper No. 7)               
          and to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 10) for the respective              
          positions of the appellant and the examiner regarding the                   

                                         -3-                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007