Appeal No. 97-1227 Application 08/163,416 The Rejections on Appeal The rejections set forth in the final Office action (Paper No. 7) are presumed to have been withdrawn by the examiner, since they are not reiterated in the examiner’s answer. The following new grounds of rejection, however, are set forth in the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 12): 1. Claims 1 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Eagen. 2. Claims 2 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Eagen. The Invention The invention is directed to management or storage of the window display data in a distributed client/server presentation system. Claim 1 is the sole independent claim and is reproduced below: 1. A data processing system comprising: a display terminal, a local processor connected to said display terminal and connected to a local processor memory, a remote processor connected to said local processor and connected to a remote processor memory, said remote processor including means for executing a plurality of application programs and means for sending window 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007