Ex parte IWAMOTO et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 97-1626                                                          
          Application 08/299,123                                                      


          specification and reads:                                                    
                    The unit body 43 assembled in this way is                         
               removed from the pallet 13 by a sorting device 76,                     
               and is conveyed on a conveyor 77 toward the next                       
               working station wherein the unit body 43 is wrapped                    
               with the outer casing 44.  The empty pallet 13 is                      
               fed back to the supply section 69 through the feed-                    
               back conveyor 78.                                                      
               A careful reading of the above reveals that there is no                
          mention whatsoever of any apparatus, and in particular the                  
          sorting device 76, for transferring pallets from the most                   
          downstream one of the intermittent conveyors to the feed back               
          conveyor 78.  Likewise, there is no mention whatsoever of any               
          apparatus, and in particular the parts supply section 69, for               
          transferring pallets from the feed back conveyor 78 to the                  
          most upstream one of the intermittent conveyors.  In addition,              
          there is no representation whatsoever in drawing Figure 2 or                
          any other drawing figure of any cooperation or interconnection              
          between the feed back conveyor 78 and either the sorting                    
          device 76 or the parts supply section 69 for carrying out the               
          transferring functions recited in the means-plus-function                   
          limitations of claim 1.                                                     


               Means-plus-function language in a claim must be construed              
                                        -10-                                          





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007