Paper No. 11
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JAMES E. SHAW
______________
Appeal No. 97-1841
Application 08/315,0521
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claim 1. The
only other remaining claims in the application, claims 4 through
6, are allowed.
The claimed invention is directed to an apparatus for
illuminating a liquid crystal display. The apparatus consists
1Application for patent filed September 29, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007