Ex parte SHAW - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-1841                                                          
          Application 08/315,052                                                      


          of a lamp and an optical element placed behind the lamp to                  
          reflect light toward the liquid crystal display.                            
               Claim 1, reproduced below, is the subject matter on appeal.            
               1.  An apparatus having a lamp side and a back side                    
          comprising:                                                                 
               a lamp disposed near the lamp side and an optical element              
          disposed between the lamp and the back side; and,                           
               the optical element having a [sic] element lamp side and an            
          element back side with reflective coatings on the element back              
          side and partially on the element lamp side and the optic [sic,             
          optical] element having a light transmissive characteristic, the            
          element lamp side further having an elevated region with no                 
          reflective coatings thereon such that a light channeling path is            
          present which tends to direct light through the element lamp side           
          where said light is reflected off the element back side and exits           
          through the element lamp side.                                              

               The references of record relied upon by the examiner as                
          evidence of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 are:                          
          Palmquist                2,379,741           July 3, 1945                   
          Meijer                   4,215,501           Aug. 5, 1980                   
               The examiner has rejected claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
          unpatentable over Palmquist in view of Meijer.  The examiner                
          explains the rejection thusly:                                              
                         Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                    
                    as being unpatentable over Palmquist in view                      
                    of Meijer.                                                        
                         Palmquist discloses an illuminated apparatus                 
                    inherently having a lamp side and a back side                     
                    comprising an optical element (fig. 1) disposed                   
                    near the back side (10) comprising an element lamp                
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007