Ex parte KUBITZ - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2116                                                          
          Application 07/789,802                                                      


          material around the body of the container for increasing the                
          axial load bearing capacity thereof.  The invention is said to              
          enable the                                                                  




          use of thinner gauge metal than heretofore considered possible              
          in such containers.  Independent claims 1 and 10, copies of                 
          which are found in the appendix to appellant’s brief, are                   
          illustrative of the appealed subject matter.                                
               The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                
          support of rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and 35 U.S.C. §              
          103 are:                                                                    
          Potts                         3,698,596           Oct. 17, 1972             
          Cvacho (‘423)                 3,799,423           Mar. 26, 1974             
          Cvacho et al. (Cvacho ‘927)   4,151,927           May   1, 1979             
          Nixon et al. (Nixon)          B 223,678           Mar.  9, 1976             
          Sasaki et al. (Sasaki)        3,972,435           Aug.  3, 1976             
                                                                                     
          Conklin                       4,138,026           Feb.  6, 1979             
          Heckman                       4,248,030           Feb.  3, 1981             
          Roales                        4,608,284           Aug. 26, 1986             
          Hoffman                       4,844,957           Jul.  4, 1989             
               The following rejections are before us for review:2                    

               With respect to each of the rejections involving Cvacho ‘4232                                                                     
          (rejections (c), (d), (e), (g) and (h)), we note the following statement found
          on pages 11-13 of the answer:                                               
                                          -3-                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007