Appeal No. 97-2116 Application 07/789,802 lines 2-4; column 6, lines 57-61; column 4, lines 45-65) to provide tapered portions 44 and 46 conforming to tapered portions 34 and 36 of the container. Reference letters A and B in Figure 2 indicate the magnitude of the deflection of the label at the upper and lower tapered portions, respectively, of the container. While it reasonably appears that the label of Roales would squeeze the container side wall, at least to some degree, in the areas where it is shrunk into contact therewith, i.e., at the upper and lower tapered portions 34 and 36, Roales is silent as to the label functioning to radially inwardly squeeze the container body “for increasing the axial strength thereof,” as required by claim 1. Further, the label of Roales is not stated to be for this purpose. See, for example, the objectives listed in Roales at column 2, line 55 through column 3, line 22. Finally, the examiner has not provided any evidence or scientific reasoning to establish the reasonableness of his belief that the functional limitation in question is an inherent characteristic -8-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007