Ex parte CARD et al. - Page 4




               Appeal No. 97-2488                                                                                                     
               Application 08/163,202                                                                                                 


               claims 22 and 37 through 41 as Group I  and claim 42 as Group II.4                                                          
               Based upon the aforementioned claim groupings and the argument                                                         
               presented, it is apparent that claims 22 and 37 through 41 stand                                                       
               or fall together and that claim 42 stands alone.  As to the                                                            
               Group I claims, we select claim 22 for review, pursuant to 37 CFR                                                      
               § 1.192(c)(7).  Accordingly, we focus our attention exclusively                                                        
               upon claims 22 and 42, infra.                                                                                          


                                                             OPINION                                                                  
                               In reaching our conclusion on the indefiniteness issue                                                 
               raised in this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully                                                           
               considered appellants’ specification, drawings, and claims 22                                                          
               and 42, and the respective viewpoints of appellants and the                                                            
               examiner.  As a consequence of our review, we make the                                                                 
               determination which follows.                                                                                           


                               We affirm the examiner’s rejection of appellants’                                                      
               claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being                                                               
               indefinite.                                                                                                            



                       4Claim 30, included by appellants, has not been specified                                                      
               herein for the reasons appearing in Footnote No. 2.                                                                    
                                                                  4                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007