Ex parte DUNN - Page 4




          Appeal No. 97-2722                                         Page 4           
          Application No. 08/329,840                                                  





               Claims 1, 2, 4 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          as being unpatentable over Shockley in view of Edmonds and                  
          Laiti.                                                                      


               Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                 
          unpatentable over Shockley in view of Edmonds and Laiti as                  
          applied to claims 1 and 2 above, and further in view of the                 
          French reference 112,504, Zopfi, Dworman, and Silverman.                    


               Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                 
          being unpatentable over Shockley in view of Edmonds, Laiti,                 
          the French reference 112,504, Zopfi, Dworman, and Silverman as              
          applied to claims 1 and 4 above, and further in view of Bass.               


               Claims 1, 2, 4 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          as being unpatentable over the French reference 112,504 in                  
          view of Edmonds and Laiti.                                                  


          invention.                                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007