Ex parte JOSHI et al. - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                

                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                 
                         today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                   
                         journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               
                                                                                                         Paper No. 12                         
                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                  
                                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                                     
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                Ex parte BHAVESH H. JOSHI and JANARDAN N. SHAH                                                                
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                        Appeal No. 97-2726                                                                    
                                                Application No. 08/296,3931                                                                   
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                                                                ON BRIEF                                                                      
                                                             ____________                                                                     
                Before ABRAMS, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                               
                NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                            



                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                         This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                               
                rejection of claims 9 through 14, which are all of the claims                                                                 
                pending in this application.2                                                                                                 


                         We REVERSE.                                                                                                          


                         1Application for patent filed August 26, 1994.                                                                       
                         2Claim 14 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007