Ex parte ANDREA et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2734                                                           
          Application 08/394,067                                                       



          claims, as they appear in the Appendix to appellants' brief,                 
          is attached to this decision.                                                


                    The prior art references of record relied upon by                  
          the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                           
          Stein                          4,476,885         Oct. 16, 1984               
          Hansen et al. (Hansen)         4,753,259         June 28, 1988               
          Acosta, Sr. (Acosta)           4,763,680         Aug. 16, 1988               
          Greatwood                      5,101,846         Apr.  7, 1992               
                    Claims 1 through 4 and 8 through 11 stand rejected                 
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as being based on a                  
          specification which, as originally filed, does not provide                   
          support for the invention as now claimed.  According to the                  
          examiner,                                                                    
                    [t]he original specification does not                              
                    disclose “a dynamic support” . . . as is                           
                    now claimed in claim 1 [and also in inde-                          
                    pendent claims 10 and 11] or “means for                            
                    dynamically    supporting . . .” as in                             
                    claim 4 (final rejection, page 2).                                 


                    Claims 1 through 4 and 8 through 11 stand addition-                
          ally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                    
          being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and                   

                                          3                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007