THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JOSE LUIS BELIL CREIXELL
__________
Appeal No. 97-2902
Application No. 08/170,3321
__________
HEARD: May 7, 1998
__________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN and
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 17 and 19-36. Claims 1-16 and 18
have been canceled. No claims have been allowed.
Application for patent filed May 24, 1994. According1
to appellant, this application is a National stage application
under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/ES93/00037, filed April 30, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007