Appeal No. 97-2902
Application No. 08/170,332
of the height of the rider when in the recited position, as
well as the relationship between the weight of the rider, the
wheelbase of the motorcycle, and the parallel lines through
the swinging arm and the “virtual line” recited in the claims.
We therefore are persuaded by the explanations and
arguments offered by the appellant on pages 5 and 9-13 of the
Brief, as supported by the exhibits accompanying it, that the
terminology in issue is not indefinite, and that the rejection
should not be sustained.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007