Ex parte KAMI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 97-3110                                                           
          Application 08/437,956                                                       


               Appellant’s invention relates to a rear chassis system                  
          for a motor vehicle. As disclosed in appellant’s                             
          specification, the chassis system comprises a pair of rear                   
          wheel suspension assemblies 2 each having a plurality of link                
          arms 5-9.  Link arms 5 and 7 through 9 are pivotally connected3                                                                   
          at their inner or base ends to arm brackets 12 (defined as                   
          ?pivoting portions? in claim 1) on a fuel tank 1. The fuel tank              
          1 comprises upper and lower shell portions 17U and 17L and an                
          inner frame 16 disposed between the upper and lower shell                    
          portions.                                                                    


               The brackets 12 for link arms 5 and 7 through 9 are fixed               
          to portions of tank 1 at regions where the shell of the tank                 
          is joined to frame 16. Thus, the link arms 5 and 7 through 9                 
          are attached to the tank through their associated brackets 12.               
          Additional brackets, described as mount brackets 13, are fixed               
          to tank 1 and receive bolts 11 for attaching tank 1 to the                   



               3The recitation of “suspension arms” in the last line of claim 1 lacks strict
          antecedent basis. We have interpreted this recitation to refer back to the claimed “link
          arms.” Although this informality does not obscure the metes and bounds of the claimed
          invention, it nevertheless is deserving of correction in the event of further
          prosecution before the examiner.                                             
                                           2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007