Ex parte MCCARTHY et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 97-3289                                                          
          Application 08/550,895                                                      



          air-filled items is taught by Brock, in which certain                       
          properties of the polyvinyl chloride plastic sheeting are                   
          improved by the addition of plasticizers (column 4, lines 33-               
          35).  According to Brock, this improves the flame resistance                
          of the plastic sheet,                                                       
          and it is our view that this improvement in safety would have               


          served as motivation for one of ordinary skill in the art to                
          so modify the plastic of the Nail mattress.  In this regard,                
          the prior art teachings relied upon need not disclose the same              
          advantage that the appellants allege, for all that is required              
          is that there is a reasonable suggestion to combine the                     
          references.  See In re Kronig, 539 F.2d 1300, 1304, 190 USPQ                
          425, 427-428 (CCPA 1976) and Ex parte Obiaya, 227 USPQ 58, 60               
          (Bd. Pat. App.  & Int. 1985).  We further note that it was                  
          known at the time of the appellants’ invention to add                       
          plasticizer to natural and synthetic rubber and resins for the              
          same reason as did the appellants, that is, to impart                       




                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007