Ex parte MCCARTHY et al. - Page 13




          Appeal No. 97-3289                                                          
          Application 08/550,895                                                      



          references to mention using the disclosed mattresses in the                 
          context of use in such a frame fail, for from our perspective               
          the mattresses disclosed by Nail, Walker and Fraige all are                 
          capable of being so used.                                                   


                                       SUMMARY                                        
                    The rejection of claims 18-23 is sustained.                       
                    The rejection of claims 9-17 is not sustained.                    
                    The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-part.                 







                    No time period for taking any subsequent action in                
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR §                  
          1.136(a).                                                                   
                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    





                    BRUCE H. STONER, JR.                )                             
                                         13                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007