Ex parte RODDER - Page 4




          Appeal No. 97-3299                                                          
          Application 08/481,900                                                      




               Our study of the corresponding portions of the disclosed               
          invention in the written description portion of the speci-                  
          fication, as well as the figures, lead us to conclude our                   
          agreement with appellant’s position set forth at page 3 of the              
          brief on appeal that the formation of a layer of semiconductor              


          material “on” a first insulating layer as recited in clause                 
          (d) of claim 26 on appeal is supported from an artisan’s                    
          perspective in the specification as filed.  The examiner’s                  
          arguments in the answer appear to be divorced from a                        
          consideration of the disclosed invention in the specification               
          and figures.  Although the conventional dictionary meaning of               
          the word “on” may in some context mean in contact with, the                 
          general meaning also includes a relative position with respect              
          to something such as on top of or over or covering.  As                     
          indicated by appellant at page 3 of the brief, the feature as               
          recited in dependent claim 28 indicates that there is an                    
          intermediate layer between the semiconductor layer and the                  
          first insulating layer, which feature is consistent with                    
          figure 4(d) as disclosed.  The term “on” in independent claim               
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007