Ex parte HIPPELY et al. - Page 14




          Appeal No. 97-3987                                        Page 14           
          Application No. 08/387,047                                                  


          Claim 10                                                                    
               We have also reviewed the reference to Langer applied in the           
          rejection of claim 10 but find nothing therein which makes up for           
          the deficiencies of Hippely and Goldfarb discussed above.                   
          Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 10                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                          


































Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007