Ex parte BOBROW et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 98-0336                                                          
          Application 08/761,014                                                      


               Claims 7, 9, 10 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                
          103(a) as being unpatentable over Kobori.                                   
               Initially we note that in the appendix to the brief, the               
          appellants note that the examiner has refused to enter certain              
          amendments and "requests the Board to take judicial notice of               
          the refused amendments in considering any further action in the             
          application."  We must point out, however, that under 35 U.S.C.             
          § 134 and 37 CFR § 1.191, appeals to the Board of Patent Appeals            
          and Interferences are taken from the decision of the primary                
          examiner to reject claims.  We exercise no general supervisory              
          power over the examining corps and decisions of primary                     
          examiners to deny entry of amendments are not subject to our                
          review.  See Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) §§                 
          1002.02(c) and 1201 (7th ed., Jul. 1998); In re Mindick, 371                
          F.2d 892, 894, 152 USPQ 566, 568 (CCPA 1967) and In re Deters,              
          515 F.2d 1152, 1156, 185 USPQ 644, 648 (CCPA 1975).  Inasmuch as            
          taking "judicial notice of the refused amendments" would, in                
          effect, overrule the examiner's decision to refuse entry of the             
          amendments, we decline to take such action.                                 




                                           3                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007