Ex parte WIGGINS - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 98-1256                                                                                                                                                
                     Application No. 08/599,934                                                                                                                                        


                     and 29.  In the paragraph bridging pages 1 and 2 of the amended brief the appellant states                                                                        





                     that "no appeal is taken from independent claim 18" (the only other claim remaining in the application)                                                           

                     and, accordingly, the appeal of claim 18 is dismissed.2                                                                                                           

                                We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                                                                                     

                                The appellant's invention pertains to a straight edge guide for cutting flooring materials.                                                            

                     Independent claim 13 is further illustrative of the appealed subject matter and a copy thereof may be                                                             

                     found in the appendix to the amended brief.                                                                                                                       

                                The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                                                          

                     Martin                          2,080,620                                  May  18, 1937                                                                          
                     Nichols                                    3,327,360                                  Jun. 27, 1967                                                               
                     Loggins                                    4,926,564                                  May  22, 1990                                                               
                     Anderson                                   5,191,716                                  Mar.  9, 1993                                                               

                                The claims on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) in the following manner:                                                                  

                                (1) Claims 13 and 14 as being unpatentable over Loggins in view of Nichols;                                                                            

                                (2) Claims 15-17 as being unpatentable over Loggins in view of Martin;                                                                                 

                                (3) Claims 20 and 21 as being unpatentable over Loggins in view of Nichols, Anderson and                                                               

                     Martin;                                                                                                                                                           

                                2In the Notice of Appeal (Paper No. 9) claim 18 was included in the appealed claims.                                                                   
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007