THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ALBRECHT MARHOLD
_____________
Appeal No. 95-0966
Application 07/984,0791
______________
HEARD: MARCH 10, 1999
_______________
Before HANLON, PAK and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through 6.2
1Application for patent filed November 30, 1992.
2Preliminary amendment A, dated November 30, 1992 canceled claims 8 through 11. Claim 7
remains in the case. Although the examiner has stated that claim 7 had been canceled in the Office
Action dated 07/13/ 93 and the Final Office Action dated 11/09/93, claim 7 has not been canceled.
However, as the Notice of Appeal is directed exclusively to claims 1 through 6, claim 7 is not before us
for decision.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007