THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent
of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte YASUHIRO KOYAMA AND HIROSHI ISHIHARA
________________
Appeal No. 95-3455
Application 07/945,9021
________________
HEARD: 13 JANUARY 1999
________________
Before METZ, JOHN DOUGLAS SMITH and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's refusal to allow claims 3 and 5 through 7, all the
claims remaining in the application.
THE INVENTION
Application for patent filed September 17, 1992.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007