THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HARRISON L. FREEMAN,
THOMAS M. HOAG,
and RICHARD G. MUSTAIN
____________
Appeal No. 1995-3501
Application No. 07/927,7881
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before SCHAFER, BARRETT, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 87 through 92, which are all of the claims
1Application for patent filed August 10, 1992. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/325,601, filed March 20, 1989, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007