Appeal No. 1995-3501 Page 3
Application No. 07/927,788
rejections, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 29,
mailed December 13, 1994) for the examiner's complete
reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the brief
(Paper No. 28, filed September 15, 1994) for the appellants’
arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to the appellants' specification and
claims, to the applied prior art reference, and to the
respective positions articulated by the appellants and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the
determinations which follows.
Appellants’ invention is a computer system which includes
a WORM. The files are organized on the WORM into path
directory groups 130 which contain a plurality of path
directory blocks each of which contains location information
that points to the file directory groups 140 associated with
that path (see Specification at page 13; Figure 3). Each file
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007