THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 40
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEAN-PAUL BINDELLE
____________
Appeal No. 95-3615
Application No. 08/003,4011
____________
HEARD: February 8, 1999
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the
examiner to allow claims 1 and 3 through 6 as amended
subsequent to the final rejection. The only other claim
remaining in the application, which is claim 13, stands
allowed by the examiner.
1Application for patent filed January 12, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007