Ex parte BINDELLE - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3615                                                          
          Application No. 08/003,401                                                  


               The subject matter on appeal relates to a continuous                   
          process for removing residual monomer from an aqueous latex of              
          a synthetic polymer.  This appealed subject matter is                       
          adequately illustrated by independent claim 1 which reads as                
          follows:                                                                    
               1.   A continuous process for removing residual monomer                
          from an aqueous latex of a synthetic polymer comprising:                    
               treating said latex of a synthetic polymer containing                  
          residual monomer by passage through a heat exchanger                        
          comprising a closed chamber divided into two distinct                       
          superposed parts, an unobstructed upper part placed under                   
          reduced pressure and adapted to communicate with a plant for                
          recovery of the residual monomer, and a lower part equipped                 
          with a partitioning bounding two separate extended and                      
          adjoining circuits, one of the circuits being traversed by the              
          latex to be treated and being maintained in communication, via              
          a top face extending over its entire path with the upper part               
          of the chamber, and the other circuit, isolated from the upper              
          part of the chamber, being traversed by a heat-transfer fluid               
          maintained at a temperature of about 40 to 100°C, said latex                
          to be treated and said heat-transfer fluid traversing their                 
          respective circuits in opposite directions, and                             
               removing said residual monomer.                                        

               No references have been relied upon by the examiner in                 
          the rejection before us.                                                    
               According to the examiner, "[c]laims 1 and 3-6 are                     
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as the                     
          disclosure is enabling only for claims limited to a process                 
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007