Ex parte SQUIRES et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1995-3903                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/062,737                                                  


                    first means for detecting the occurrence of each                  
               said sector mark from the data read by said                            
               transducer;                                                            
                    second means connected to said first means for                    
               determining and storing from the last two said                         
               sector marks detected by said first means the sector                   
               period for a previous sector to a present sector for                   
               use as a predicted length for the present sector;                      
               and                                                                    
                    third means, in response to said sector mark                      
               detected by said first means for said present sector                   
               and said sector period for said previous sector                        
               determined and stored by said second means, for                        
               scheduling the initiation of each of said plurality                    
               of processes so as to maintain said initiation of                      
               each of said processes in a constant spatial                           
               relationship to said predict present sector period                     
               thereby minimizing the effect of variations in the                     
               rotational speed of said rotating media and                            
               synchronizing the initiation of said processes to                      
               said sector mark for the present sector.                               

               The reference relied on by the patent examiner in                      
          rejecting the claims follows:                                               
          Moon et al. (Moon)            4,669,004                May 26,              
          1987.                                                                       

               Claims 37-47 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
          obvious over Moon.  Rather than repeat the arguments of the                 
          appellants or examiner in toto, we refer the reader to the                  
          briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.                   








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007