THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HISASHI SHICHIJO and RICHARD J. MATYI
____________
Appeal No. 95-4761
Application No. 08/012,7811
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 14-20, all of the claims pending in the present
application. Claims 1-13 have been canceled. An amendment
1Application for patent filed January 29, 1993.
According to the appellants, the application is a division of
Application No. 07/918,777, filed July 27, 1992, now Patent
No. 5,238,869, issued August 24, 1993, which is a continuation
of Application No. 07/224,428, filed July 25, 1988, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007