Ex parte GUEDES et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-0309                                                          
          Application 08/135,370                                                      

                    a multiplexer for generating a succession of                      
               parcels, each parcel comprising a plurality of time                    
               slots, at least one of said time slots including a                     
               portion of said first sequence of parts, and                           
                    frequency dispersion means for distributing the                   
               information content of two successive ones of said                     
               parcels for simultaneous transmission as signals in time               
               multiplexed slots of at least two of said channels                     
               respectively, said information content being transmitted               
               once only; and                                                         
                         another of said stations comprises a receiver                
               comprising:                                                            
                    means for receiving and demultiplexing said signals               
               in said time multiplexed slots of said at least two of                 
               said channels, and                                                     
                    means for providing a replica of said first of said               
               information signals based on the received signals,                     
                    whereby, in said receiver, correction of burst                    
               errors affecting the content of one channel is simplified              
               without need for redundant transmission.                               

               No prior art is relied on in the rejection.                            
               The specification stands objected to and claims 26-41                  
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, because              
          the examiner finds that the "means for encoding" and "means                 
          for interleaving" of claims 26 and 39, and the "means for                   
          deinterleaving and decoding" in claim 37, "are not disclosed                
          in the original disclosure" (Final Rejection, page 2).                      
          "Therefore, the disclosure does not enable one skilled in the               
                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007