THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte SHUNICHI WADA, YASUO NAITOU
and KAZUMICHI TSUTSUMI
__________
Appeal No. 96-0323
Application 08/131,6841
___________
HEARD: December 10, 1998
___________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims 1-4,
6-7, and 9-12. The other claims remaining in the application,
Claims 5 and 13, stand objected to as being dependent upon a
rejected base claim.
Claim 1 reads as follows:
1 Application for patent filed October 5, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007