THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RONALD D. HANSON, RAMESH N. PATEL and LASZLO J.
SZARKA
____________
Appeal No. 96-0724
Application No. 07/817,2321
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants seek review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1 through 9 and 11 through 18, all
of the pending claims. We reverse and remand to the examiner
for further consideration consistent with this decision.
1Application for patent filed January 6, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007