THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHIGERU MITSUHASHI, YOSHIMASA MATSUSHIMA, TAKASHI
IMAI, KIICHI MORI, MAMORU YAMADA, HIROSHI SUGIYAMA, MISAO
YAGI, HITOSHI KONDO and TOSHIMITSU HAGIWARA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0896
Application No. 08/091,4061
____________
HEARD: November 2, 1999
____________
Before OWENS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 14, 1993. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/779,528, filed October 18, 1991, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007