THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WEI-KAO LU, CHARLES Q. JIA,
VISHWAPRAKASH S. HEGDE and STEVEN HOI-CHIU NG
________________
Appeal No. 96-1188
Application No. 08/240,8001
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed May 10, 1994. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/059,243, filed May 7, 1993, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007