THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte ALEXANDER SROMIN et al.
__________________
Appeal No. 96-1301
Application 08/175,0781
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5, 7-15, 17-19, 21
and 22. Claims 6, 16 and 20 have been objected to by the
examiner as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but
would be allowable if rewritten in independent form.
References relied on by the Examiner
Hawsey et al. (Hawsey) Patent 4,996,457 Feb. 26, 1991
Takahashi et al. (Takahashi) Patent 4,551,645 Nov. 5, 1985
1
Application for patent filed December 29, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007