Ex parte SROMIN et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1301                                                          
          Application 08/175,078                                                      
          as a magnet located directly on the other face of the sheet.                
          Thus, the polar orientation of the magnets on opposite faces                
          is co-directional.                                                          


               Claim 1 reads as follows:                                              
               1.   A rotor for use in an electric machine, comprising:               
               (a) a central member having a pair of opposing faces;                  
          and                                                                         
               (b) at least one pair of permanent magnets, each of said               
          at        least one pair of permanent magnets including at                  
          least          a pair of magnet pieces, said magnet pieces of               
          said           pair of permanent magnets being connected to                 
          said           central member      opposite from each other on              
          opposing            faces of said central member, said pair of              
          magnet         pieces characterized in that the polar                       
          orientation of           said magnet pieces of said pair of                 
          permanent magnets is          co-directional.                               
                                       Opinion                                        
               We sustain the rejection of claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          112, second paragraph.  We also sustain the rejection of                    
          claims 1-5, 7-15, 17-19, 21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) or              
          102(b) as being anticipated by Hawsey.  However, we do not                  
          sustain the rejection of claims 1-5, 7-15, 17-19, 21 and 22                 
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) or 102(b) as being anticipated by                  
          Takahashi.                                                                  



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007