Ex parte LYKENS - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1555                                                          
          Application 08/229,619                                                      

                    image from said display surface and for reflecting                
                    images from one another to produce reflected images               
                    in order to create a segmented, kaleidoscopic                     
                    composite image having image segments including said              
                    reflected images;                                                 
               each of said mirrors presenting the shape of a triangle                
                    having a base adjacent said display surface and two,              
                    equal-length edges, adjacent ones of said mirrors                 
                    presenting an image axis at the juncture thereof,                 
                    said image axis presenting an angle of less than 90E              
                    relative to said display surface, each of said                    
                    mirrors presenting an interior base angle of less                 
                    than 90E relative to said display surface.                        

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
               Coates                   1,090,278        March 17, 1914               
               Akins                    4,475,126      October 2,                     
          1984                                                                        
               Baird et al. (Baird)     4,952,004       August 28, 1990               
               Claims 1-8, 11-17, 20-29, and 32-37 stand rejected under               
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Akins and Coates.                
               Claims 18, 19, 30, and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Akins, Coates, and Baird.                  
               We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 10) and the                 
          Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 16) (pages referred to as "EA__")              
          for a statement of the Examiner's position and to the Brief                 
          (Paper No. 14) (pages referred to as "Br__") for Appellant's                
          arguments thereagainst.                                                     


                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007