Ex parte OHTA et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 96-1669                                                                                                                     
                 Application 08/054,125                                                                                                                 



                 moisture proof film formed on the other surface of the sub-                                                                            
                 strate, and a second protection film formed on the moisture                                                                            
                 proof film, wherein the moisture proof film consists of AlSiN,                                                                         
                 and wherein a product of the refractive index of the moisture                                                                          
                 proof film and the thickness thereof is 42 nanometers or less.                                                                         
                                                                                                                                                       
                                   The Examiner relies on the following reference:                                                                      
                 Ohta et al. (Ohta)          0,467,705             Jan. 22,                                                                             
                 1992                                                                                                                                   
                 (European Patent Application)                                                                                                          
                                   Claims 1, 3 through 6, 9 and 10 stand rejected under                                                                 
                 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ohta.                                                                                       
                                   Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants                                                                    
                 and the Examiner, reference is made to the briefs  and answer                           2                    3                         
                 for the respective details thereof.                                                                                                    




                          2On October 16, 1995, Appellants filed an appeal brief.                                                                       
                 On February 10, 1996, Appellants filed a reply brief.  On                                                                              
                 September 30, 1996, the Examiner mailed a communication stat-                                                                          
                 ing that the reply brief has been entered into the record.                                                                             
                          3The Examiner has filed an Examiner's answer on December                                                                      
                 4, 1998.  The record shows that the Examiner had previously                                                                            
                 filed three additional Examiner's answers.  However, the case                                                                          
                 was remanded to the Examiner on October 22, 1998 and in re-                                                                            
                 sponse    to the remand, the Examiner filed the Examiner's                                                                             
                 answer dated December 4, 1998.  Therefore, we will consider                                                                            
                 only the Examiner's answer dated December 4, 1998 for this                                                                             
                 appeal.                                                                                                                                
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007