Ex parte OHTA et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 96-1669                                                          
          Application 08/054,125                                                      



          prior art reference or shown to be common knowledge of                      
          unquestionable demonstration.  Our reviewing court requires                 
          this evidence in order to establish a prima facie case.  In re              
          Knapp-Monarch Co., 296 F.2d 230, 232, 132 USPQ 6, 8 (CCPA                   
          1961); In re Cofer, 354 F.2d 664, 668, 148 USPQ 268, 271-72                 
          (CCPA 1966).                                                                
                    Turning to Ohta, we find that Ohta teaches on page 3              
          that the moisture-impermeable film may be selected from                     
          inorganic moisture-impermeable film such as AlN, SiN, ZnS,                  
          Al O , SiO , SiAlON, or from organic moisture-impermeable films23     2                                                                  
          such as polyvinylidene chloride and                                         
          polytrifluorochloroethylene.  Ohta further discloses that                   
          among these materials AlN is particularly preferred.                        
          Furthermore, Ohta teaches that the thickness of the moisture-               
          impermeable films depends on the material used thereof.                     
          Further, we note that Ohta does not teach using AlSiN nor does              
          Ohta teach a product of the refractive index of the moisture                
          proof film and the thickness thereof is 42 nanometers or less.              




                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007