Ex parte WOODWARD - Page 2




               Appeal No. 96-1827                                                                                                     
               Application 08/112,576                                                                                                 


               pending in the application.                                                                                            



                       The invention relates to “a set of pieces for playing a modified form of chess” (specification,                

               page 1).  Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:                                                                

                       1.  A set of pieces for a modified version of chess for two players in which ownership of the                  
               pieces may change throughout the course of the game, comprising two subsets of pieces for ownership                    
               initially by respective players, wherein each piece has an upright stem portion having a shape which                   
               indicates the denomination of the piece and direction indicating means for indicating the orientation of               
               the piece relative to a player and hence the ownership of the piece throughout the course of the game.                 

                       The references relied upon by the examiner as evidence of anticipation and obviousness are:                    

               Wade                            Des. 169,230                   Mar.  31,  1953                                         
               Samuels                         3,947,040                      Mar.  30, 1976                                          

               “Shogi,” Waddington’s Illustrated Encyclopedia of Games, pages 50-51, Pan Books, London, 1984                          
               (Waddington)                                                                                                           

                       The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                                                                 

                       a) claims 1 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as failing to particularly point               

               out and distinctly claim the subject matter the appellant regards as the invention;                                    

                       b) claims 1, 4 through 6, 9, 10 and 13 through 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                            

               anticipated by Samuels;                                                                                                

                       c) claims 2, 3, 11, 12 and 17 through 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                      

               Samuels in view of Waddington; and                                                                                     


                                                                  2                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007