Ex parte TANIAI et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-2742                                                            
          Application No. 08/311,371                                                    


               In summary, the admitted prior art does not disclose or                  
          suggest any electrical signals from the carrier to the                        
          recording and reproducing unit, and more specifically does not                
          suggest direct signals without use of the director.  Kuo does                 
          not disclose or suggest adding communication between the                      
          carrier and the recording and reproducing unit, and                           
          particularly does not suggest a direct communication between                  
          the two.  Therefore, the                                                      




          examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of                        
          obviousness, as the combination does not include all of the                   
          limitations recited in the claims.  Accordingly, we cannot                    
          sustain the rejection.                                                        












                                          10                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007