|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsUS CodeUS Constitution |
Ex parte PECK et al. - Page 1Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 1999 > Ex parte PECK et al. - Page 1 Sponsored Links
Paper No. 25
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JAMES V. PECK,
GEVORK MINASKANIAN
and
JONATHAN HADGRAFT
______________
Appeal No. 1996-2790
Application 08/102,1761
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges, and
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims
46 through 49, all the claims pending in the application.
1Application for patent filed August 4, 1993. According to applicants, this
application is a continuation of Application 07/673,016, filed March 21, 1991.
1
|