Appeal No. 96-2894
Application 08/742,974
In conclusion, the § 112, second paragraph rejection of
claims 1-8 is reversed.
35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
"Anticipation is established only when a single prior
art reference discloses, expressly or under principles of
inherency, each and every element of a claimed invention."
RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d
1440, 1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
Claim 9
Appellants argue (Br13, third para.) that Andersen does
not disclose the following limitations in the last
subparagraph of claim 9 (numbers in brackets added): "[1] a
course delivery system distributed over said at least one
workstation, said servers, and said main computer [2] to
deliver a course from said at least one workstation to said
repository."
The examiner's position is as follows (FR5):
(e) a course delivery system see 6:46, 5:56-58;
6:3-9;
information is distributed
- 8 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007