Appeal No. 96-3442
Application No. 08/253,884
2. Claims 2, 3, 5, and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over the prior art as illustrated in
Fig. 1 of the present application in view of Shin and further
in view of Sobue.
3. Claims 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the prior art as illustrated in Fig. 1
of the present application in view of Sobue.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Brief and Answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the Examiner and the
evidence
of obviousness relied upon by the Examiner as support for the
rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, the Appellant’s
arguments set forth in the Brief along with the Examiner's
rationale in support of the rejections and arguments in
rebuttal
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007