THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIDEYUKI HANAOKA, ICHIRO MINAMI, RYOJI KURIBAYASHI,
TAKUYA KUWAHARA, MUNENORI FUJIMOTO, KAZUMA YOSHIDA
and TAKASHI OKIYAMA
____________
Appeal No. 96-3561
Application No. 08/045,2411
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, FLEMING and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 20 and 35. Claims 21 through 33 have been
1Application for patent filed April 13, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007