Ex parte KOBAYASHI et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 96-3614                                                          
          Application 08/259,154                                                      


          magnetic film and an equipotential is formed therebetween                   
          because of said direct contact therebetween via said hole, and              
          wherein said coil film is electrically insulated by an organic              
          insulating resinous film having an insulation resistance                    
          sufficient to electrically insulate said coil film in view of               
          the thickness of said insulating film.                                      
          The references                                                              
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Hirai et al. (Hirai)          4,550,353           Oct. 29, 1985             
          Schwarz et al. (Schwarz)      4,800,454           Jan. 24, 1989             
          Diepers                       4,853,815           Aug.  1, 1989             
          Masud et al. (Masud)          4,878,290           Nov.  7, 1989             
          Lazzari                       5,208,716           May   4, 1993             
                                   (§ 102(e) date: Nov. 16, 1990)                     
          The rejections                                                              
               The rejections are stated in the Answer as follows:                    
               Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                   
          unpatentable over Schwarz in view of Diepers and Hirai (Answer              
          at 4).                                                                      
               Claims 4-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                       
          unpatentable over Schwarz in view of Diepers and Hirai,                     
          further considered in view of Lazzari and Masud (Answer at 6).              
               Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable              
          over Diepers in view of Schwarz and Hirai (Answer at 9).                    



                                        - 7 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007