THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SAMI DICK, BERNARD GENIES, LAHCEN OUGARANE
and PATRICK RECOURT
____________
Appeal No. 96-3652
Application No. 08/348,8201
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed November 28, 1994.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/190,241 filed February 1, 1994, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/913,008 filed July 14, 1992, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007