Ex parte SCHIEVE - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not 
               written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding        
               precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                 Paper No. 17         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte ERIC W. SCHIEVE                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                  Appeal No. 96-3850                                  
                              Application No. 08/253,4801                             
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1 through 12, which are all of the claims               
          pending in this application.                                                
               The appellant's invention relates to a system for testing              
          hardware interrupt service routines for a microprocessor prior              

               Application for patent filed June 3, 1994.1                                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007