THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CHING-YUH TSAY,
HUGH P. MCADAMS
and WAHKIT LOH
_____________
Appeal No. 96-4003
Application 08/288,1311
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before BARRETT, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-31 which constitutes
all the claims in the application. In response to Appellants’ Appeal Brief filed October 11, 1995, the
Application for patent filed August 9, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a1
continuation of Application 08/083,427, filed June 28, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007