Ex parte RAO - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1996-4030                                                        
          Application 08/104,462                                                      



          groupings in the briefs.  37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7) (July 1, 1995)               
          as amended at 60 Fed. Reg. 14518 (March 17, 1995), which was                
          controlling at the time of Appellant's filing the brief,                    
          states:                                                                     
                    For each ground of rejection which                                
                    appellant contests and which applies to a                         
                    group of two or more claims, the Board                            
                    shall select a single claim from the group                        
                    and shall decide the appeal as to the                             
                    ground of rejection on the basis of that                          
                    claim alone unless a statement is included                        
                    that the claims of the group do not stand                         
                    or fall together and, in the argument under                       
                    paragraph (c)(8) of this section, appellant                       
                    explains why the claims  of the group are                         
                    believed to be separately patentable.                             
                    Merely pointing out differences in what the                       
                    claims cover is not an argument as to why                         
                    the claims are separately patentable.                             
          Appellant has provided a statement that claims 1, 3 and 4 may               
          be considered together as a group.  We will, thereby, consider              





          Appellant's claims 1, 3 and 4 as standing or falling together               
          and we will treat claim 1 as a representative claim of the                  
          group.                                                                      

                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007