THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES F. HOOVER
____________
Appeal No. 1996-4135
Application No. 08/346,3251
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed November 29, 1994.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/108,946, filed August 18, 1993, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/724,022, filed July 1, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007